Posts : 5981 Standard Cash : 59444 Reputation : 512 Join date : 2011-07-11 Age : 43 Location : New York
Subject: Would you pay PPV price for this card? Thu Nov 12, 2015 3:51 pm
Just a hypothetical, all WMMA UFC card (AKA- "UFC: Invicta! lol)
I wanted to put Cyborg vs Rousey in here, but I decided to keep true to "current UFC fighters.
Soooooo.........
Quote :
MAIN CARD:
Bantamweight Championship
Ronda Rousey vs Cat Zingano II
Straweight Championship
Joanna Jedrzejczyk vs Rose Namajunas
Bethe Correia vs Holly Holm
Paige Van Zant vs Jessica Penne
Undercard:
Miesha Tate vs Julianna Pena
Michelle Waterson vs Felice Herrig
Tecia Torres vs Amanda Nunes (125lb Catchweight bout)
stock Top 10 King
Posts : 2377 Standard Cash : 35192 Reputation : 274 Join date : 2011-08-01 Location : Madison
Subject: Re: Would you pay PPV price for this card? Thu Nov 12, 2015 3:57 pm
Only if it were free, but not really a fair question as it would take a pretty miraculous card for me to pay anything for any card.
Too easy to find the fights for free either streamed or online if I am willing to wait until the next morning. I've been burned too many times paying big bucks to watch a bunch of shitty fights that go to the judges. In other words, I am pretty much done supporting these "pay-per" cards short of some significant rule changes and better fights top -to -bottom.
Gecko Title Holder
Posts : 2437 Standard Cash : 15324 Reputation : 163 Join date : 2011-07-11 Age : 43 Location : Washington DC
Subject: Re: Would you pay PPV price for this card? Thu Nov 12, 2015 4:35 pm
Half price only cause i really like only half the card but change out Page vs Pena for Page vs Calderwood then i would be more happy. but to be honest it really isn't a bad all female card and would probably be more exciting than a lot of old all men's fight cards i have seen in the past.
Triggerman99 Title Holder
Posts : 5981 Standard Cash : 59444 Reputation : 512 Join date : 2011-07-11 Age : 43 Location : New York
Subject: Re: Would you pay PPV price for this card? Thu Nov 12, 2015 4:47 pm
Yeah I tried to stack it as best I could with even matchups (i.e. striker vs striker, grappler vs grappler, etc.). I had to reach a little since the divisions are so thin, and actually swapped out a lot of the fighters after initially matching them up differently.
I'm not 100% sure I'd pay full price for a WMMA UFC card, but if I was going to, it would have to look very similar to this.
norcalmatt Pro Fighter
Posts : 1076 Standard Cash : 16389 Reputation : 103 Join date : 2011-07-10 Age : 47 Location : high up in the sierra nevadas (ca)
Subject: Re: Would you pay PPV price for this card? Thu Nov 12, 2015 6:20 pm
I would have to say that tate deserves to be on the main card for sure.....and the holm fight on undercard
Triggerman99 Title Holder
Posts : 5981 Standard Cash : 59444 Reputation : 512 Join date : 2011-07-11 Age : 43 Location : New York
Subject: Re: Would you pay PPV price for this card? Thu Nov 12, 2015 8:08 pm
norcalmatt wrote:
I would have to say that tate deserves to be on the main card for sure.....and the holm fight on undercard
Ya think so??
I was thinking Holm and Correia being recent title challengers should warrant main-card billing.
OK, how about this:
Quote :
MAIN CARD:
Bantamweight Championship
Ronda Rousey vs Cat Zingano II
Straweight Championship
Joanna Jedrzejczyk vs Rose Namajunas
Miesha Tate vs Holly Holm
Paige Van Zant vs Jessica Penne
Undercard:
Bethe Correia vs Julianna Pena
Michelle Waterson vs Felice Herrig
Tecia Torres vs Amanda Nunes (125lb Catchweight bout)
Sponsored content
Subject: Re: Would you pay PPV price for this card?
Wed Feb 15, 2023 6:42 pm by 
Calendar
