UFC 165 Jones vs. Gustafsson: Numbers Shenanigans ?

Shenanigans? Just late to editing..... who knows... what do you guys think?

The original numbers


The edited numbers


FightMetric numbers

I always take this stuff with a grain of salt.

While I do feel that Gustaffson won the fight, I can't just point to a stat sheet and say "See?".
Whenever a fight is close, one side of the debate always says the numbers don't lie, while the other side always says the intangibles tell the real story (aggression, taking the center of the Octagon, damage done/taken, etc.).
The fact that there is such a wide margin between the two sets of numbers here tells me that I should probably lean towards the latter arguement (intangibles), because the stats are so unreliable.
I mean come on; how do the stats go from both fighters landing only siginificant strikes and Gustaffson holding a 71 strike advantage to Jones actually holding the advantage by 23? That's a 94 point swing right there. Really?

Yeah, I'm with ya on the notion that stats don't tell the whole tale. But there is surely something odd there... that is a huge swing... especially for the exact same stat sheet.

Sooo how did Gustaffson lose 80 strikes in the edited numbers? How could they have been that off?

Yeah... even if it was just a "keying error", it's a pretty damn huge error.

I find it humorous what they consider "significant" strikes.
Jones must hit softer than my 4 year old daughter if he can land 134 significant strikes on someone and not even knock him down.

All of his lame ass knee kicks are counted as "significant"... even though they had little to no affect what so ever.