| | Bisping said no to fights with munoz and cung le |  |
|
+3Triggerman99 9Teen_AT4 Gecko 7 posters |
| Author | Message |
|---|
Gecko
Title Holder
Posts : 2437
Standard Cash : 15327
Reputation : 163
Join date : 2011-07-11
Age : 43
Location : Washington DC
|  Subject: Bisping said no to fights with munoz and cung le Fri Mar 23, 2012 11:40 am | |
| http://www.fightline.com/fl/news/2012/0322/547891/michael-bisping/
Not a bad read, it turns out Bisping thought the barbarian was the most dangerous and wanted a real dangerous striker. Between cung le,munoz and Boestch, i would have to agree that he has the most dangerous stand up of the 3. makes sense too if you are planning for a title fight with Silva down the road. | |
|
| | |
9Teen_AT4
Pro Fighter
Posts : 816
Standard Cash : 7709
Reputation : 28
Join date : 2011-09-08
| | Subject: Re: Bisping said no to fights with munoz and cung le Fri Mar 23, 2012 12:34 pm | |
| Bisping would TKO Cung, he would probably decision win Munoz. So yeh the Barbarian is a more ENTERTAINING fight IMO. | |
|
| | |
Triggerman99
Title Holder
Posts : 5981
Standard Cash : 59447
Reputation : 512
Join date : 2011-07-11
Age : 43
Location : New York
| | Subject: Re: Bisping said no to fights with munoz and cung le Fri Mar 23, 2012 12:43 pm | |
| - Gecko wrote:
- it turns out Bisping thought the barbarian was the most dangerous and wanted a real dangerous striker.
No way in hell is that why he wanted to fight Boetsch. He needs a rebound fight, and Boetsch is the best bet for that right now. He can't fight a scrub, because that would make him look bad, so he fights a guy who, on the surface, seems like a top guy. But Boetsch is only high profile because he got his kicked all over the place for most of the fight against Okami and then caught him with some haymakers for the comeback W. Then, if Bisping beats Boetsch, he can claim he just took out a "top contender", when in reality, he was just smart enough to take the fight with exactly the right guy at exactly the right time to get a head start on gaining some big momentum while minimizing the risk. | |
|
| | |
Krieger
Title Holder
Posts : 2176
Standard Cash : 5734
Reputation : 194
Join date : 2011-08-12
Location : Calgary
| | Subject: Re: Bisping said no to fights with munoz and cung le Fri Mar 23, 2012 1:24 pm | |
| Right now Le is a fading entity no reason to fight him.... the other two six of one .... either would be a good fight and you gotta pick someone. | |
|
| | |
Chrom
Hall of Famer
Posts : 5966
Standard Cash : 22853
Reputation : 257
Join date : 2011-07-06
Age : 42
Location : Minnesota
| | Subject: Re: Bisping said no to fights with munoz and cung le Fri Mar 23, 2012 3:54 pm | |
| | |
|
| | |
Grey Suit
Hall of Famer
Posts : 296
Standard Cash : 31181
Reputation : 68
Join date : 2011-07-10
Location : San Diego
| | Subject: Re: Bisping said no to fights with munoz and cung le Fri Mar 23, 2012 10:50 pm | |
| So how is Boestch even remotely in the same league as Munoz? | |
|
| | |
Krieger
Title Holder
Posts : 2176
Standard Cash : 5734
Reputation : 194
Join date : 2011-08-12
Location : Calgary
| | Subject: Re: Bisping said no to fights with munoz and cung le Fri Mar 23, 2012 11:06 pm | |
| Heh ... how did I know this would quickly deteriorate to haters vs nut huggers.
C'mon its a fight choice lets watch the fight and see what happens. Sheesh
| |
|
| | |
norcalmatt
Pro Fighter
Posts : 1076
Standard Cash : 16392
Reputation : 103
Join date : 2011-07-10
Age : 47
Location : high up in the sierra nevadas (ca)
| | Subject: Re: Bisping said no to fights with munoz and cung le Fri Mar 23, 2012 11:12 pm | |
| i tend to agree with trigg as well.....not tryin to hate on either guy, just sayin
| |
|
| | |
Grey Suit
Hall of Famer
Posts : 296
Standard Cash : 31181
Reputation : 68
Join date : 2011-07-10
Location : San Diego
| | Subject: Re: Bisping said no to fights with munoz and cung le Fri Mar 23, 2012 11:27 pm | |
| Not hating just wondering, Munoz is a top tier guy where Boesch is not. | |
|
| | |
Krieger
Title Holder
Posts : 2176
Standard Cash : 5734
Reputation : 194
Join date : 2011-08-12
Location : Calgary
| | Subject: Re: Bisping said no to fights with munoz and cung le Fri Mar 23, 2012 11:50 pm | |
| I'm liking Boesch, and Munoz and Bisping. They would all be good fights. | |
|
| | |
Triggerman99
Title Holder
Posts : 5981
Standard Cash : 59447
Reputation : 512
Join date : 2011-07-11
Age : 43
Location : New York
| | Subject: Re: Bisping said no to fights with munoz and cung le Sat Mar 24, 2012 2:00 am | |
| I'm noy saying any choice is a bad choice for Bisping. Shit, Bisping/Boetsch will probably be sweet. I'm just sayin...... Bisping wants to fight him because he's a dangerous striker and Bisping wants to fight him for that reason? COME ON, MAN!!!!!  | |
|
| | |
Sponsored content
| | Subject: Re: Bisping said no to fights with munoz and cung le | |
| |
|
| | |
| | Bisping said no to fights with munoz and cung le | |
|
Calendar
