Chrom Hall of Famer
Posts : 5966 Standard Cash : 23052 Reputation : 257 Join date : 2011-07-06 Age : 43 Location : Minnesota
| Subject: Record-chasing Jones talks Sonnen rematch clause Wed Sep 19, 2012 9:46 am | |
| - Quote :
- UFC light-heavyweight champion Jon Jones has underlined to ESPN the No. 1 reason why he rejected the fight with Chael Sonnen at UFC 151, and also explained why the option of a rematch clause did not make a difference to his decision to turn down the fight on eight days' notice.
Jones is set to meet Vitor Belfort in an explosive title bout on Saturday, but the build-up to UFC 152 is still overshadowed by the cancelled 151 card. Instead of fighting Belfort on September 22, Jones could have taken Sonnen as an injury replacement for Dan Henderson on September 1, earning severe criticism for his decision not to do so. The fallout saw a number of explanations emerge from the Jones camp, so ESPN asked the champion to clarify exactly why he opted not to fight a middleweight who was offering to step up on short notice. "The No. 1 reason I didn't take the fight with Chael Sonnen was timing," Jones said. "When you're fighting for a world title, it means more to the person who holds that title than anyone else in the world. Whether you're a fan, a promoter or a fighter, nobody goes to bed at night as a UFC champion. I do, and I know what it means. "So to put it all on the line, for anyone else's behalf, makes no sense to me. No-one gave me the championship; it's not like the WWE when you become the champ if you have the highest ratings. "The fact that you even care enough to talk to me now, I've had to earn, so at the end of the day the championship means more to me than anyone else in this world. A lot of people never understand why I wouldn't want to gamble that on eight days' notice. "I've fought the best guys in the world so it wasn't a question of being afraid or something, it's about forming the best strategy to be successful, and that's what we've done by waiting and giving ourselves another month." In reaction to Jones' explanation, ESPN put it to the Greg Jackson fighter that a rematch clause would have protected him from throwing away his title due to lack of preparation. Had Jones been shocked by Sonnen, a rematch clause would have allowed him to win the belt straight back after a full camp, but Jones explained why that would not have worked. "A rematch would not have been an option because I'm closing in on the record for consecutive wins in the division, and that's really driving me," he said. "I'm a champion, so the only direction I can go is down unless I find ways to stay at the top, unless I have things like records to spur me on to greater things. "Risking a loss, and starting all over on my immediate goal - the record for successful title defences at 205 - would have absolutely sucked."
Read more at http://www.espn.co.uk/ufc/sport/story/170864.html#ftkl1ZLvBdxaRTBz.99 | |
|
Gecko Title Holder
Posts : 2437 Standard Cash : 15526 Reputation : 163 Join date : 2011-07-11 Age : 44 Location : Washington DC
| Subject: Re: Record-chasing Jones talks Sonnen rematch clause Wed Sep 19, 2012 11:28 am | |
| Jones- reason i didnt take sonnen was cause i might have lost, even though he was a smaller,lighter, not even as close as heavy handed as his original oponet? Jones stop talking about 151 it is going to do nothing but hurt you. | |
|
Triggerman99 Title Holder
Posts : 5981 Standard Cash : 59646 Reputation : 512 Join date : 2011-07-11 Age : 43 Location : New York
| Subject: Re: Record-chasing Jones talks Sonnen rematch clause Wed Sep 19, 2012 4:12 pm | |
| Oh my god, just shut the fuck up already!
Everytime you open your mouth, you make youself sound more and more like a selfish asshole. If this dude has a PR advisor, they must be shitting blood by now. | |
|
the commie Pro Fighter
Posts : 742 Standard Cash : 8161 Reputation : 66 Join date : 2011-09-18
| Subject: Re: Record-chasing Jones talks Sonnen rematch clause Wed Sep 19, 2012 6:53 pm | |
| egomaniac in the worst sense | |
|
Sponsored content
| Subject: Re: Record-chasing Jones talks Sonnen rematch clause | |
| |
|